On Mon, 10 May 2004 01:17:27 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >They don't require glibc 2.3.4, they require any glibc that provides some particular @GLIBC_2.3.4 symbols. Fedora includes >a glibc CVS snapshot (this is nothing new, all Red Hat/Fedora distributions used CVS snapshots for several years), which >provides those @GLIBC_2.3.4 symbols. What's the problem? The problem may be that I'm looking in the wrong place. I'm also not sure that I understand what you mean; how do the glibc 2.3.4 symbols get to be there, if not in a glibc? The other problem is that Fedora sites I'm looking at _don't_ seem to have snaphots of glibc, and the main cvs seems to be permanently busy, or offline. I've really been having a hard time with this, could someone just give me a shove in the right direction? Robert
