On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Christopher Chan wrote: > Since I didn't take any of the RH1xx or 2xx courses, I cannot really say > much. The RH300 is rather disappointing in that respect...the instructor > really did not teach much, I felt, except go over the material and > through the practicals. > > So at best it was exposing you to new areas covered by the exam like you > say... while it was some time back, the rationale for the RH300 was a rapid-fire coverage of all the topics you needed for the RHCE exam. it was meant to amalgamate all of the content in the RH033, RH133 and RH253 courses in a single 4-day boot camp, if you will. its goal seemed more as a review, as in, "here's all the stuff you're going to need" and to fill in any gaps you had. it was most emphatically not for those people who needed to *learn* all that stuff. if you didn't know the vast majority of that stuff already, you were definitely in the wrong place. rday
