On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 12:55, info wrote: > I agree. > I don't like the fact that pine isn't included with FC1 > However, I installed it no prob. > I don't care for mutt, so I installed pine. > I think pine should be included with FC We've been on this merry-go-round before. Pine's license is incompatible with Fedora's mandate. As you say, it's not hard to install if you want it. Why needlessly encumber this already hefty distribution with even more duplicated packages? I'm all for pulling some stuff *out* of Core instead. -- Ben Steeves _ bcs@xxxxxxxxxx The ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) ben.steeves@xxxxxx against HTML e-mail X GPG ID: 0xB3EBF1D9 http://www.metacon.ca/ascii / \ Yahoo Messenger: ben_steeves
