On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 15:04, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Mo, den 16.02.2004 schrieb Martin Alderson um 14:43: > > On 16 Feb 2004, at 13:34, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > <snip> > > > Use vim or (x)emacs. Highly commended. > > > > Your kidding, right? > > No, not at all. > > > There is no way you can design a heavily graphical site using a text > > editor. > > You mean those websites with all these flickering animated graphics? > > I really think, a web page you can not overlook in a text editor isn't > worth to be published. You always have to handle css and html files in > source. At least to make the site cross-browser compatible. > <snip> That depends on the intended audience, and if you actually think it's wort the extra work to satisfy the few people out there with terminal-only setups. Personally, for 99% of the web pages out there, I don't. Personally, for 100% of the web pages, you do. Neither of our opinions makes any difference as the OP specifically asked for a WYSIWIG web design tool, and vi, emacs, bluefish and so on does not belong in that category. -- Tarjei
