Re: Security updates are too slow or none existant

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Security updates are too slow or none existant
• From: Chuck Mize <cmize@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 16:40:55 -0800
• In-reply-to: <1076199917.2673.69.camel@matrix>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1076199917.2673.69.camel@matrix>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 16:25, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote:

> The Debian solution seems more reasonable!  Why don't you just get these
> security updates into Fedora like some of the other reputable linux
> distros e.g. Debian.

Then why don't you demand your money back and go use Debian? Oh that's
right, you didn't have to pay anything for Fedora...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Security updates are too slow or none existant
    • From: William Hooper
  • Re: Security updates are too slow or none existant
    • From: Ernest L. Williams Jr.

• References:
  • Security updates are too slow or none existant
    • From: Nathan G. Grennan
  • Re: Security updates are too slow or none existant
    • From: William Hooper
  • Re: Security updates are too slow or none existant
    • From: Ernest L. Williams Jr.

• Prev by Date: Re: Vncviewer won't start
• Next by Date: Slow KDE 3.2.
• Previous by thread: Re: Security updates are too slow or none existant
• Next by thread: Re: Security updates are too slow or none existant
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread