On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 18:48, Austin Isler wrote: > Why drop the the RHL line if you just turn around and have products like > RHPW. RHL became a familiar line, and I think it would have just been > better to implement the features of RHPW into RHL and package it as > that. (IMO) That one's easy... RHL -> not profitable RHEL -> profitable -- Akebono vs Godzilla! Coming soon to a theater near you.
