On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 18:45, Tim Kossack wrote: > > what i meant was that the mentioned companies invest far more effort into > usability and polishness of their desktop(s) (plugins, tools) than red hat > does (that is, if red hat prof. workstation doesn't offer more in this > respect than fc - and by that i don't mean access to rhn as well as > higher reliability). i should've written "red hat has _basically_ given > up...if i'm not mistaken, that was also the main point of the article. So I guess having a dedicated desktop product (RHPW), and hiring more desktop software developers is a sign of "giving up" now ? http://www.redhat.com/about/careers/boston/ Your mails are beginning to match the theme of article. Based on ill-formed misconceptions, misquotes and just plain FUD. This is also getting way offtopic for Fedora-list btw, but sadly we don't have a redhat-fud-counter@xxxxxxxxxx list. Dave
