Today , while talking to my boss, he said that , when comparing two boxes , one running Suse and other running Redhat/Fedora , the Suse box is more secure then the Redhat/Fedora box.. He said that running nessus on both showed that suse was more secure..
Anyone knows why?
He mentioned something about the default config for apache , as an example... Maybe we could find out what are these "security flaws" so we can create an RFE on bugzilla to make a default install safer to everyone...
Any ideas?
(I'm asking this just because I want to improve the security of fedora, as I dont like suse a lot.... just my personal opinion...)
Pedro Macedo
