Res wrote:
Do you have any more details availible on the tests you ran? (What test systems were used, how you created the test load, what the resulting measurements were, etc)
I wouldnt use it in a samba file server for win$hit boxes, especially if
you have a lot of them, we ran dual test, and the 7.3 boxes kicked fedora
all over the place for speed, moved them to rh9 still going fine, fedora
was laggy slow horrid,
I'd really be quite interested, especially as I recently moved my samba from 7.3 to FC1.
It was just getting to be too annoying and painful for me to compile new software for the old systems...
kbdrate seems set to exactly the same defaults on RH8.0 as in FC1. What's BS about it? Does it not work as advertised?Oh and fedoras kbdrate setting is BS
