Re: src.rpms only for ethical reasons? (was: kernel-module-nvidia-driver for kernel-2.2.22-1.2149.nptl?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 18:00:45 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:03:30AM +0000, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:
>> Various parts of the upstream release are binary only and proprietary,
>> therefore a binary "repackaging" of the NVidia self-extracting archive is
>> a bit ethically "questionable", putting it mildly. Not that I'm judging
>> other efforts (Axel), just stating that personally I wouldn't do it. In a
>> perfect world, NVidia would officially release the full driver/glx SDK as
>> GPL'd OSS, but I think we all know that's never going to happen.
> 
> I do not understand the logic. Either one rejects nvidia's policy,
> then you do not ship a src.rpm at all, or one lives with it and builds
> the binaries as well.

Redistributing proprietary binaries makes me nervous, that's all. The
NVIDIA software license is full of ambiguity, which inclines me to not
modify the upstream at all before release. You're right, maybe it is a big
fuss about nothing, but I've got an ambiguous licence in one hand, and the
principles of Fedora (and OSS in general) in the other.

So, as you point out, why do I bother at all? Because despite the nature
of closed source software, in this case it is something I need and use
every day.

>> The Livna source RPM contains the original upstream release intact,
>> [...]
> 
> Which is not different at ATrpms.

Right, I just meant that source RPMs in general should (and in your case
and ours do) contain a clean upstream release.

>> Rebuilding only takes a few seconds, but if you really want a binary only
>> solution then stick with Axel Thimm's binaries at:
>> 
>> http://apt.physik.fu-berlin.de/fedora/1/en/i386/RPMS.at-testing/
>> 
>> (also in "at-bleeding")
> 
> "binary only"? You imply you have access to nvidia's sources?

I wish !!! No, I meant "if you don't want to rebuild src.rpms"

> BTW that's the "wrong" URL, the correct one is
> 
> http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/name/nvidia-graphics/

Thanks, I was just quoting from my apt sources list.




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux