Re: Whitebox Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 08:12, WipeOut wrote:
> David C. Hart wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 07:30, Mark wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Yes and currently testing it.  Seems like a good distro so far. 
> >>
> >>On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 06:16, WipeOut wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Has anyone taken a look at www.whiteboxlinux.org ??
> >>>
> >>>Its basically RHEL 3 recompiled from the src.rpms. No price, No restrictions..
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >Fedora looks more current. Is there anything in WB that is not in FC1?
> >
> Yes, theoretical support for the current version till 2008.. :)

and hopefully stability.  Testing here so far looks very good.  There
have been a number of reports on the whitebox-devel
(http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-devel) and whitebox-users
(http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users) lists of good results
using Fedora packages either directly or by rebuilds form source.  Some
of the basic packages were also adopted from Fedora to satisfy
dependencies missing in the RHEL SRPMs and to produce a self-hosting OS
-- rebuilds on itself -- unlike RHEL.

Dag Wieers RHEL3 Repository (http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el3/en/i386/dag)
seems to work (minimal testing so far) for extra compatible packages.

May also want to have a look at:

  Tao Linux - http://taolinux.org/

  cAos or CentOS - http://caosity.org/

> Makes using Fedora great for desktops and development systems and WBEL 
> great from production servers..
> 
> Later..

Agree with the server part, but am still forming an opinion of the
suitability of Fedora for production desktops that require a high degree
of stability.  WBEL might be a good choice there also, but not as much
fun as Fedora for those who want the latest-greatest or bleeding-edge
packages. ;^)

Quoting an earlier thread...
> None of the RH-derived variants is likely to be good for your Windoze
> users - not very well-rated as a desktop OS.  Xandros, Lycoris, SuSE,
> Mandrake, and Lindows [if you're not afraid of running as root :( ]
> have all gotten better reviews in that area.

Phil Schaffner
 





[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux