Re: Update patches versus full update RPM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Leonard den Ottolander said:
> Hi William,
>
>> Problem being that downloading the reference RPMs and the patch would
>> probably _increase_ server load.
>
> The reference rpm comes from your installation CD's.

Please read the post I replied to.  The comment was something like "I
would use the space, or just use the additional bandwidth".

As a point of reference, two of the three Fedora machines I run don't have
a CD-Rom, and none of them were installed from CD media.

>> Of course doing an either/or would be an option, but what do you make
>> the
>> default?
>
> Just leave as is, and let people who need to save on bandwidth setup their
> systems to use the (r)syncing instead.

How does this help the problem of an overworked download server, then? 
People on dial-up will get timeouts just as easily as people on broadband.

> The following thread on rsync@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is informative:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg07943.html

Notice how few rsync servers there are on the mirror list?  Part of the
reason is that rsync can put a much larger load on the server.  Any kind
of decompression and/or recompression will just make that worse.


--
William Hooper




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux