Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.
• From: Simon Perreault <nomis80@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:51:51 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <1073661875.3198.64.camel@roque> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
• User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

On January 9, 2004 10:48, Lamar Owen wrote:
> That was the summary.  There has been backlash; demand needs to be
> established.  You want it, ask the developers.  What's wrong with that
> picture?

It's not polite.

-- 
Simon Perreault <nomis80@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- http://nomis80.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.
    • From: Lamar Owen

• References:
  • Update patches versus full update RPM.
    • From: Lamar Owen
  • Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.
    • From: Rui Miguel Seabra
  • Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.
    • From: Lamar Owen

• Prev by Date: Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.
• Next by Date: Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.
• Previous by thread: Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.
• Next by thread: Re: Update patches versus full update RPM.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread