On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 10:27:22 +0800 Christopher Chan <cchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> typed with great determination: >>what license? DJB does not believe in licensing. >> >>I cannot believe that people actually come out and complain about what > >>they can or cannot do with somebody's work. Well, I didn't complain per se about what can or can not be done with the work. I don't use the work, but if I did, I wouldn't have a problem with it then now would I? Secondly, once you state what can or can not be done with something, I'm thinkin' that's a license. It may not even be on a piece of paper, but it's still a license. A license is after all, Authority or liberty given to do or forbear any act. This is especially true if it is a formal permission from proper authorities (in this case the writer of said software) to do a certain act (or not do a certain act). Is this not correct? I would think so. Alex
Attachment:
pgp5MHerj5XQe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
