Re: The 2.6 kernel is available for "Shrike"??? Why not Fedora instead??

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: The 2.6 kernel is available for "Shrike"??? Why not Fedora instead??
• From: Kai Thomsen <kai.thomsen@xxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 23:33:33 +0200
• In-reply-to: <1066491103.4348.2.camel@matrix>
• References: <[email protected]> <1066491103.4348.2.camel@matrix>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 11:31:43 -0400, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote:

> I went and got the kernel and installed.  Howver, there are no header
> files for the kernel.  I need to build stuff against the 2.6 kernel.
> 
> Don't we need the kernel SRPMS out there as well??

I think you just need the `kernel-source' package from the `RPMS.kernel'
directory.


--Kai

• References:
  • Re: The 2.6 kernel is available for "Shrike"??? Why not Fedora instead??
    • From: M A Young
  • Re: The 2.6 kernel is available for "Shrike"??? Why not Fedora instead??
    • From: Ernest L. Williams Jr.

• Prev by Date: GPG signature
• Next by Date: Re: GPG signature
• Previous by thread: Re: The 2.6 kernel is available for "Shrike"??? Why not Fedora instead??
• Next by thread: unpacked SRPMs for updates
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread