On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 02:49, Lamont R. Peterson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 18:32, Warren Togami wrote: > > Are the binary only drivers faster or have some other benefit? > > Otherwise I wouldn't risk it due to the common stability problems and > > your inability to report bugs to Fedora. You need to go to ATI for > > support if you use their closed drivers. > > My understanding of the way that ATI deals with drivers is this: the > only driver not available as open source is the one for the current > highest end chipset/card. When they release the next version of the > chipset and/or Radeon card, they release the previously binary-only > driver (for Linux, but maybe for other platforms, too?) as open-source. > > OK. If this understanding is accurate, then you have the best driver > for your card by getting the open source one. > <snip> So what you're saying is that one can get the source for the 3.2.7 drivers? Or am I missing something? Where can I get the 3.2.7 source if that's the case? Cheers, -- Tarjei
