At least, I thought it was...maybe I'm wrong?
Mike Burger wrote:
Keeping in mind that the FreshRPMS repository is comprised of RPMS compiled from the RH/Fedora SRPMS?
Kevin Francis wrote:
I find myself in complete agreement with you. It is important that people realise that they cannot mix and match repositories.
I want cool apps too, but not at the price I might have to pay.
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:33, Jonathan C. Sitte wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Is freshrpms.net working with Fedora or just creating rpms without even
thinking about what we have all been talking about? I am concerned
because it seems like everyone is using it anyways... It is interesting
how things are developing here. I am being very careful not to just
start loading Fedora with 3rd Party rpms until I know that they are safe
to use. I HIGHLY recomend that http://fedora.redhat.com/ posts a section
for TRUSTED rpm repositories or the repositories themself have a
specific icon that says Fedora Safe or something of that matter. They
can all use the same icon or banner... It would be nice... Just an idea ;)
-- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to:
site-update-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a message of:
subscribe
