Re: redhat-config-xfree86 enhancement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Craig White wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 20:35, John McBride wrote:

You, a person who makes a redundant comment, then resorts to name-calling while closing things out, yeah that makes a lot of sense!


--- - I fail to see anywhere where I called you names. I did however, suggest that you were whining.


Yes, you did.

- How to ask questions the smart way...
  <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>

There is somewhat an implied contract when asking questions to a user
supported forum of open source software. There is a lot of wisdom to be
gleaned from reading the page linked.


You should carefully review the posts. I never asked a question; I merely suggested an enhancement.


Sometimes people just expect everything to be done the windows way and
then, they want it to be free, supported for free, and then think that
because they like it way windows does it, that someone should change
things. Good thought - doesn't fly here. You participate by using the
software, helping to support others, contributing code, helping write
documentation, etc.



I can't code worth a damn. I've done all the other things, though. Sorry I can't fully meet your demands for posting on the Fedora list. I never clicked through any such list of requirements when I joined the list, so personally I consider your enumeration of posting requirements without merit.


If you can back up this claim of posting requirements with a link to official RedHat policy (in particular the code contribution requirement) I will apologize for all my posts and remove myself from the list immediately.

If you can't back it up with offical RedHat policy, I think you should start doing some thinking about the things you write, and the rights you claim.

If you think your commentary about how xfree86 should exit with errors,
you should probably take it over to the development list at xfree86.

This is interesting--a quick review of my posts shows no such commentary. My thought about an enhancement was directed squarely at a Fedora configurator.



Moreover, I suggested that you look into kickstart which seems to be far more suitable for the 'automated' install and can invoke the x configuration setup at the right time. Good thing your mind wasn't closed to that suggestion.

Once again, please review the posts. This thread has already gotten to the point of being completely useless, but just to defend myself, I will repeat that the technician does the final configuration of each workstation at his desk, and then deploys the machine to the user's work area. He has to sign off on a number of QC steps, as in "a signature", he's not going to kickstart that, because he can't--he must walk the steps. The displays differ at the two points--this is not a big problem in Windows, but is a minor annoyance in Fedora, since the GUI is lost and our staff (all Windows people) have no idea what to do. You can call them, or me, "lusers", "noobs", "whiners", etc--whatever makes you feel like a big, burly CLI kind of guy--but that will not change the facts.



Lastly - despite the appearance of a text based console - which apparently you want to avoid like the plague - it is no more difficult nor time consuming to actually run 'redhat-config-xfree86 --reconfig' than it is to click your way through a 'new hardware found' setup on Windows. Unfortunately, plug and play doesn't work as well on Linux as it does on Windows these days - which still doesn't work perfectly either but hey - it's getting better.


Personally I don't really care either way. The customers, however, do. I like, use and enjoy supporting Linux, except for nights like tonight. People like you make it marginally less enjoyable, but only marginally so.


I'm not looking to pick a fight with you - nor insult you. The whining
comment was fair considering what I perceive to be your arrogance to
think that you somehow had earned the right to get on this list and
announce how you think things should be when I have never seen you help
anyone, write any support documents, or participate in any meaningful
way.


You already insulted me, so don't try to take it back now. Please, I urge you to forward your suggestions for the management of the Fedora list to RedHat--particularly your plan to determine who has the right to join and post to this list. I'm sure they will enjoy reading about your plans almost as much as I have.





[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux