Re: x86-64 and FC1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 12 December 2003 01:36 pm, Gareth Bult wrote:
> Ok,
>
> Without wishing to start a flame war, Promise controllers on Linux
> generally work well.
> (although I couldn't vouch for their RAID controllers)
>
> Two or three IDE Promise controllers works fine together, and with one
> disk per channel
> they make a fantastic (and VERY reliable) software RAID setup. I've run
> many systems this
> way over many years. (on both Linux and NT!)
>
> (I have an SX4000 in the next room with 800Gb on RAID 5 - very quick,
> very cheap, never
> had a problem with it)
>
> As far as the SATA (or SATAN as I now call it) is concerned, FC1 doesn't
> support it, however
> (as a matter of Interest) Mandrake 9.2 RC1 for amd64 does (!) and it
> installs and runs Ok.
> (which is more than you can say for the rest of the Mandrake distro ...
> don't!!)
>
> If you compile 2.6-test11 with SATA inline (it seems to be less happy as
> a module (!)) then
> this works fine on FC1. (the problem you have is getting to a point
> where you can compile it)
>
> Once I've finished messing around I'll see if I can produce a native
> boot.iso for the ASUS boards
> with working SATA and a 2.6 kernel ...
>
> HTH
> Gareth.
>
> On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 17:22, Mark Lane wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 10:05, Pete wrote:
> > > Has anyone tried to get this running on an Asus K8V? I downloaded the
> > > x86-64 tree from duke (thanks to those who did this, the effort is much
> > > appreciated), which was easy enough, but unfortunately, I have two SATA
> > > drives in ATA mode (no need for raid on my desktop), which the default
> > > kernel doesn't see. I really think I have two options here, one is to
> > > wait for a kernel to be created that has the Promise driver and is
> > > included as an update, or to hack it a bit.
> >
> > Well I wouldn't use the Promise (Promise Controllers suck). The VIA SATA
> > that is in the chipset is much better. Though you probably won't be able
> > to installed to it. Best bet is to install on a IDE drive and then
> > compile a 2.6 Kernel. It seems to have better support for the via
> > chipset though the drivers now have been backported to 2.4.23.

Wow, thanks, but 2.4 would be fine as well. I'm not looking for the world, 
just something I'm happy with. I've never had an issue with this controller, 
which is obviously not the normal, but I'm not gonna complain. I'm writing 
this from Mandrake 9.2 for the amd64. I'm just not happy with the rc1 version 
of this and am not sure what the deal will be with updates and such as this 
is not a run of the mill desktop version and I suspect Mandrake wants to make 
money on it. I'm not willing to pay for it. That said, if it would just be 
possible to get the Promise SATA controller into whatever kernel boots the 
iso would be great, as from there it's not a big leap to keep it running. 
Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux