Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

On Dec 31 2007 18:43, Patrick Mau wrote:
>
>May I ask something that might be obvious for most of the
>development community:
>
>Modules have to be loaded in seperate pages, right ?

That seems to be the case, judging from /proc/modules always ending in 000,
meaning each module is aligned at 0x1000 (4096, a page on i386).

Additionally, it looks like 48% of all kernel symbols (from System.map)
are aligned to 16 byte boundaries (what a waste! ;-))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
  - From: Patrick Mau <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] configfs: dir.c fix possible recursive locking
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] crypto: scatterwalk.h needs sched.h
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]