Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

> I'd say the practical advantage to the user would be almost zero.
> Which distribution is going to enable this option and defacto
> banning external modules?

It would be a real nuisance for developing code let alone for using it.
The entries are currently far bigger than is needed and fixing that would
be much more productive.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
    • From: "Torsten Kaiser" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
    • From: Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
    • From: "Torsten Kaiser" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
    • From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override
• Next by Date: Re: Recursive variable `KBUILD_CFLAGS' references itself (eventually).
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]