Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: seperate handler for msix and normal int.

* Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> wrote:

> [PATCH] forcedeth: seperate handler for msix and normal int.
> 
> so we don't need to keep checking np->msi_flags to see if 
> NV_MSI_X_ENABLED is set in handler

hm, why is this patch needed and what's the effect of this patch?

i'm also wondering, what happened to Jeff's very nice flow cleanups and 
simplifications to forcedeth.c. They are not in 2.6.24 - are they queued 
up for 2.6.25 perhaps?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] forcedeth: seperate handler for msix and normal int.
    • From: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86 makefile unification and cleaning
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] forcedeth: seperate handler for msix and normal int.
• Next by thread: [PATCH] security: remove security_sb_post_mountroot hook
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]