[PATCH 16/30] Unionfs: remove unnecessary lock in read_inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Our read_inode doesn't need to grab the superblock rwsem because there no
chance it could be affected by branch management.  But our read_inode was
called from other places which did grab need to grab that rwsem, and lockdep
complained.

Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[email protected]>
---
 fs/unionfs/super.c |    3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/unionfs/super.c b/fs/unionfs/super.c
index c474c86..8b70aca 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/super.c
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ static void unionfs_read_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	int size;
 	struct unionfs_inode_info *info = UNIONFS_I(inode);
 
-	unionfs_read_lock(inode->i_sb);
-
 	memset(info, 0, offsetof(struct unionfs_inode_info, vfs_inode));
 	info->bstart = -1;
 	info->bend = -1;
@@ -63,7 +61,6 @@ static void unionfs_read_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	inode->i_mtime.tv_sec = inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = 0;
 	inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0;
 
-	unionfs_read_unlock(inode->i_sb);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.5.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux