Re: [patch 1/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.

Hello.

Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> I apologize if I'm commiting a faux pas by asking this, but any chance
> of renaming this to something like strictdev or sdev, or at least with
> 'dev' in it somewhere?

You are not commiting a faux pas. But, this naming is my personal feeling. ;-)
You can see the origin at http://I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/tomoyo/index-en.html .

Happy Holidays!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 0/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.
    • From: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
  • [patch 1/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.
    • From: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Updated Kernel Hacker's guide to git
• Next by Date: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.
• Next by thread: [patch 2/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]