On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:16:01 -0500 "Ed L. Cashin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 13/13] update copyright date
Please put an identfier for the subsytem in patch titles. In this case,
Subject: [PATCH 13/13] aoe: update copyright date
would suit.
I dropped aoe-remove-race-between-use-and-initialization-of-locks.patch,
queued the rest and added the below, thanks.
aoe: statically initialise devlist_lock
From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
I guess aoedev_init() can go away now.
Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Cc: "Ed L. Cashin" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---
drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c~aoe-statically-initialise-devlist_lock drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c
--- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c~aoe-statically-initialise-devlist_lock
+++ a/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static void freetgt(struct aoedev *d, st
static void skbpoolfree(struct aoedev *d);
static struct aoedev *devlist;
-static spinlock_t devlist_lock;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(devlist_lock);
int
aoedev_isbusy(struct aoedev *d)
@@ -291,7 +291,5 @@ aoedev_exit(void)
int __init
aoedev_init(void)
{
- spin_lock_init(&devlist_lock);
return 0;
}
-
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
