Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog

Kok, Auke wrote:

ok, that's just bad and if there's no user-defineable limit to the deferral I
definately don't like this change.

Can I safely assume that any irq will cause all deferred timers to run?

*on that cpu*. Timers are per cpu, as are interrupts. Just not per se the same one ...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
    • From: "Kok, Auke" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
    • From: "Kok, Auke" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
• Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
• Next by thread: [PATCH] e1000: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]