Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix dmi_alloc() to not advance alloc index in case of failure

* Parag Warudkar <[email protected]> wrote:

> dmi_alloc() for CONFIG_X86_64 is defined to allocate from a static 
> array and it maintains a allocation index which is advanced each time 
> allocation is attempted - it gets incremented even if an allocation 
> fails thereby depriving any future request that may be small enough to 
> be satisfied from the array.
>
> Fix this by first testing if allocation is going to be possible and 
> incrementing alloc index only then.

Thanks, applied. Nice catch!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86: Fix dmi_alloc() to not advance alloc index in case of failure
    • From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix DMI out of memory problems
• Next by Date: Re: The code segment of the user level in PPC64 are in VMAs with write permissions
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86: Fix dmi_alloc() to not advance alloc index in case of failure
• Next by thread: [PATCH] clocksource.c: Use init_timer_deferrable for clocksource_watchdog
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]