[PATCH] no need to mess with KBUILD_CFLAGS on uml-i386 anymore

	Now that X86_32 is provided on Kconfig level for uml-i386, there's
no need to play with it explicitly on Makefile level anymore.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile-i386 b/arch/um/Makefile-i386
index 6729011..561e373 100644
--- a/arch/um/Makefile-i386
+++ b/arch/um/Makefile-i386
@@ -22,11 +22,6 @@ export LDFLAGS HOSTCFLAGS HOSTLDFLAGS UML_OBJCOPYFLAGS
 endif
 endif
 
-KBUILD_CFLAGS		+= -DCONFIG_X86_32
-KBUILD_AFLAGS		+= -DCONFIG_X86_32
-CONFIG_X86_32		:= y
-export CONFIG_X86_32
-
 # First of all, tune CFLAGS for the specific CPU. This actually sets cflags-y.
 include $(srctree)/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] no need to mess with KBUILD_CFLAGS on uml-i386 anymore
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] regression: bfs endianness bug
• Next by Date: [PATCH] fcrypt endianness misannotations
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] regression: bfs endianness bug
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] no need to mess with KBUILD_CFLAGS on uml-i386 anymore
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]