Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git

hi,

> Which is a combination of two patches, which seems to have dropped the
> chunk you show below.  The reason this seems to have my signoff is
> that I originated one of those patches, and parts of the second, but
> in fact I had never seen f230d3f53d72d05bcb5666ab7e2eccd49c8b3a15
> until after this email ...

I guess in my rush to get those patches submitted before leaving SAN
People I missed that chunk.  Sorry.

David: The Signed-off line was kept as-is to keep the attribution correct.


> Your patch looks correct, and seems to be the only obvious chunk
> that's missing.  So, I'll ack it FWIW ... usual policy for these
> patches is to go through Russell.

You can add my Ack for what it's worth.


Regards,
  Andrew Victor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git
    • From: Jan Altenberg <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git
    • From: Jan Altenberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield
• Next by Date: S3 resume stability problems
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]