Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks

On Saturday 01 December 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> maybe, but we'd have to see how often this gets triggered. An OOM is 
> something that could happen in any overloaded system - while a hung task 
> is likely due to a kernel bug.

What about a client using hard mounted NFS shares here? That shouldn't be
killed by the OOM killer in that situation, should it?

Am I missing sth.?


Best Regards

Ingo Oeser
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c section fix
• Next by Date: Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
• Previous by thread: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
• Next by thread: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]