Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove trailing NULs from network bonding sysfs interface.

Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:49:54 +0100 =?utf-8?q?Ferenc_W=C3=A1gner?= wrote:
>
> Patches 1 & 3 use
>
> 	if (res) statement;
>
> but the preferred form is
>
> 	if (res)
> 		statement;
>
> Even if this style was already used in the source file, it should
> be cleaned up.

No principal problem.  So that I learn something useful: how should I
go about this?  I created the patches with git-format-patch, and they
depend on each other, so I'd rather not git-reset, if possible...

Can I just create a follow-up patch which fixes this stylistic issue?
-- 
Thanks,
Feri.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove trailing NULs from network bonding sysfs interface.
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/3] Remove trailing NULs from network bonding sysfs interface.
    • From: =?utf-8?q?Ferenc_W=C3=A1gner?= <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove trailing NULs from network bonding sysfs interface.
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/25] elevate write count open()'d files
• Next by Date: Re: m68k build failure
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove trailing NULs from network bonding sysfs interface.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove trailing NULs from network bonding sysfs interface.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]