Re: Clarification re: outstanding IPC flaws

Sorry for the double post.

On Nov 26, 2007 12:01 PM, Tom Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have some questions about this comment.
>
> Most importantly - does this mean that if I have multiple processes
> queued inside semop() calls with sem_val = -1 (also, if it matters,
> SEM_UNDO flag is set),

This should read "sem_op = -1" as opposed to "sem_val = -1".

Cheers,
Tom Burns
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Clarification re: outstanding IPC flaws
    • From: "Tom Burns" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: enable dual rng on VIA C7
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: add power management support -v2
• Previous by thread: Clarification re: outstanding IPC flaws
• Next by thread: [PATCH] fix up ext2_fs.h for userspace after reservations backport
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]