Re: [BUG] jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:48:58 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:

> NO_HZ?  Highres timers?

CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
# CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is not set
 
> I understand that the previous kernels behave correctly.  All of them?

2.6.21 behaved correctly. Sorry but git-bisect would take a lot of time (I
can't reliably reproduce the jiffies jump), so I would avoid that if not
strictly needed.


-- 
Ciao
Stefano
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [BUG] jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [BUG] jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
    • From: Stefano Brivio <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUG] jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: possible BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
• Next by Date: Re: "buggy cmd640" message followed by soft lockup
• Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
• Next by thread: Re: [BUG] jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]