> > Testing sched-cfs-v2.6.24-rc3-v24.patch on top of 2.6.24-rc3-git1
> > (ignored the two "already applied" messages coming from git1
> > commits), I get a 1.00 minimum load in top, coming from the
> > load_balance_mo thread staying in D-state. I get this on 2 different
> > computers with similar configs, so I am attaching one of them here.
* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> [071120 13:55]:
> does the patch below fix that problem for you?
Yes, it does. Thanks for your answer.
Damien
> Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -7138,7 +7138,7 @@ static int load_balance_monitor(void *un
> else if (timeout < sysctl_sched_max_bal_int_shares)
> timeout *= 2;
>
> - msleep(timeout);
> + msleep_interruptible(timeout);
> }
>
> return 0;
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Prev by Date:
Re: [lm-sensors] broken suspend [Was: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1]
- Next by Date:
Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-11-20-01-45.tar.gz uploaded
- Previous by thread:
Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Next by thread:
Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
- Index(es):
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
