Re: [PATCH 0/4] proc: Cleanup status files.

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> There is a long standing ugliness with /proc/<pid>/stat,
> /proc/<pid>/statm, and /proc/<pid>/status that they do not
> use the seqfile API.
> 
> In addition they are currently reporting pids in the pid namespace
> of the current task instead of the pid namespace with which proc
> was mounted which is confusing.

100% agree with that. Thanks for fixing this issue :)

Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>

> This patch series first build the infrastructure to allow these
> problems to be fixed and then it converts the individual proc
> status files.
> 
> Eric
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] do_task_stat: don't use task_pid_nr_ns() lockless
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 0/4] proc: Cleanup status files.
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: laptop reboots right after hibernation
• Next by Date: Possibility to adjust the only-root-can-bind-to-port-under-1024 limit
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] proc: seqfile convert proc_pid_statm
• Next by thread: [PATCH] proc: Proper pidns handling for /proc/self
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]