Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] cpu-hotplug: Refcount Based Cpu Hotplug implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> * Gautham R Shenoy <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >  void lock_cpu_hotplug(void)
> >  {
> > -	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
> > -
> > -	if (tsk == recursive) {
> > -		static int warnings = 10;
> > -		if (warnings) {
> > -			printk(KERN_ERR "Lukewarm IQ detected in hotplug locking\n");
> > -			WARN_ON(1);
> > -			warnings--;
> > -		}
> > -		recursive_depth++;
> 
> i nominate it for a 2.6.24 merge due to it fixing the above 
> regression. I've seen regular instances of the "Lukewarm IQ" message.

FYI, i've put these 3 patches into the scheduler git tree and it's 
looking very good so far. So unless Andrew or Linus objects to put this 
into v2.6.24, or there's serious questions during review, could we merge 
it this way?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux