Re: Divide-by-zero in the 2.6.23 scheduler code

* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:

> As for the patch, better to just rip out the entire feature..

for -stable it's safer to have smaller patches - so this patch is 
perfectly fine. A user can turn it back on under SCHED_DEBUG and by 
tweaking a debug flag - but that's not a big issue, you can mess up the 
system in numerous ways via /proc/sys anyway. So i'd suggest Chuck's 
patch for -stable.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

	Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Divide-by-zero in the 2.6.23 scheduler code
    • From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Divide-by-zero in the 2.6.23 scheduler code
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: Divide-by-zero in the 2.6.23 scheduler code
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sound/pci: Drop unnecessary continue
• Next by Date: Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
• Previous by thread: Re: Divide-by-zero in the 2.6.23 scheduler code
• Next by thread: Re: Divide-by-zero in the 2.6.23 scheduler code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]