On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:28:48PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Can we avoid string parsers in the kernel?
> >
>
> Ok, Could someone suggest a better idea please ?.
I personally think string parsers are *much* better than the alternatives
(which basically boil down to nasty binary interfaces)
> I thought about packing the rules in a structure and sending
> it over an ioctl() command. Is this applicable ?
That's *MUCH* worse.
Strings are nice. They aren't that complex, and as long as it's not a
performance-critical area, there are basically no downsides.
Binary structures and ioctl's are *much* worse. They are totally
undebuggable with generic tools (think "echo" or "strace"), and they are a
total nightmare to parse across architectures and pointer sizes.
So the rule should be: always use strings if at all possible and relevant.
If the data is fundamentally binary, it shouldn't be re-coded to ascii (no
real advantage), but if the data is "stringish", and there aren't big
performance issues, then keep it as strings.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
