Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486DX4

H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Apparently because the Intel documentation disagrees with itself. That's all.

Just to be perfectly clear: I much prefer the code with the short (near) jump, because it keeps the code cleaner. I have sent a patch to Mikael to test out.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486DX4
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486DX4
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486DX4
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486DX4
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix i486 boot failure due to stale %ds
• Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486DX4
• Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486DX4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]