Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:52:35 +0100,
> Stefan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> if (!grp->is_visible ||
>> grp->is_visible(kobj, *attr, i))
>> add or remove();
>>
>
> Hm, I find that a bit harder to parse...
if (grp->is_visible == NULL ||
grp->is_visible(kobj, *attr, i))
add or remove();
However, how beautiful the implementation of static void remove_files()
and static int create_files() looks doesn't matter. What's important is
that
struct attribute_group {
const char *name;
+ int (*is_visible)(struct kobject *,
+ struct attribute *, int);
struct attribute **attrs;
};
makes sense to users --- because this is the API.
[BTW, like most of the existing driver core APIs, there are kerneldoc
comments missing here.]
> mask_out() would also imply that the common use case is to have all
> attributes in the group created and that you need to take action to
> have an attribute not created.
Here you have a point. But James has a point too when he says:
| We basically want to show capability by which file is present.
Anyway, /if/ the reverse logic is preferred, it shouldn't be called
"mask_out()" but rather "is_masked()" or "is_hidden()" or the like.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =-=- =====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
