Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> This patch contains the planned removal of the eepro100 driver.
>>>
>> Are the e100 people satisfied that e100 now handles all known cases? I 
> 
> Nope.  There are still e100 work outstanding that means we cannot kill
> eepro100.

Agreed, there is still a receive unit hang in the last version that I got from
David Acker.

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
    • From: David Acker <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] VFS: new fgetattr() file operation
• Next by Date: Re: Opteron box and 4Gb memory
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]