On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> No reason to keep the feature-removal-schedule.txt entry after the code
> was removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 9 ---------
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> ecf4ac4330ec61cecb1665c8c39702e600633b80
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 6b0f963..b9b8269 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -191,15 +191,6 @@ Who: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
>
> ---------------------------
>
> -What: Interrupt only SA_* flags
> -When: September 2007
> -Why: The interrupt related SA_* flags are replaced by IRQF_* to move them
> - out of the signal namespace.
> -
> -Who: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> -
> ----------------------------
> -
> What: PHYSDEVPATH, PHYSDEVBUS, PHYSDEVDRIVER in the uevent environment
> When: October 2008
> Why: The stacking of class devices makes these values misleading and
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]