Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections

> 
>  Arguably all the existing linker scripts should be made more consistent I 
> suppose.  Currently all the {init,exit} annotations are handled separately 
> by each architecture, so this would be no exception.  If you have a 
> proposal as to how to do it cleanly, people will certainly appreciate it.

Patches appreciated. I have made many of the linekr scripts use same
format now - so it is easier to see what is equal and can be consolidated.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
    • From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
    • From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
• Next by thread: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]