Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>> Should we re-add them for the function pointers in
>>>> asm-x86/paravirt.h?
>>>>
>>> yes, yes, yes. :-) It was a nightmare to sort it out in -rt (and
>>> still is).
>>>
>> Do you have a patch to do this already?
>>
>
> yes, attached. Ack?
>
> Ingo
>
> ---------------------------->
> Subject: [patch] paravirt: mark assembly dependencies as fastcall
> From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
>
> the 'fastcall removal' changes to paravirt.c were over-eager: they
> removed fastcall annotations from functions that are (or might be)
> implemented in assembly. So if someone changes the compiler model,
> such as -pg which disables regparm, the kernel breaks in nasty ways.
>
> so this patch adds back fastcall annotations. This serves as
> documentation for assembly calling-convention dependencies as
> well.
>
It would be really nice if we could get the compiler to warn about
whether mismatches in fastcall use. Without at least a compiler warning
about mismatches between the function pointer type in paravirt_ops and
the actual function, it will almost certainly rot and fail if you
actually need to depend on the annotations.
What's the issue with regparm and -pg?
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c | 6 -
> arch/i386/kernel/smp.c | 7 +
> include/asm-i386/desc.h | 18 ++--
> include/asm-i386/io.h | 2
> include/asm-i386/irqflags.h | 12 +-
> include/asm-i386/msr.h | 13 +--
> include/asm-i386/page.h | 21 ++---
> include/asm-i386/paravirt.h | 156 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> include/asm-i386/pgtable-2level.h | 10 +-
> include/asm-i386/pgtable-3level.h | 18 ++--
> include/asm-i386/pgtable.h | 2
> include/asm-i386/processor.h | 8 -
> include/asm-i386/system.h | 22 ++---
> include/asm-i386/time.h | 4
> include/asm-i386/tlbflush.h | 4
> 15 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
>
Hm, so it will still need a fair amount of work to update to the
current kernel and add all the lguest/vmi/xen functions (and presumably
the out of tree kvm stuff too).
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rt1/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23-rt1.orig/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c 2007-10-11 15:58:08.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rt1/arch/i386/kernel/paravirt.c 2007-10-11 16:00:03.000000000 -0400
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ void init_IRQ(void)
> paravirt_ops.init_IRQ();
> }
>
> -static void native_flush_tlb(void)
> +static fastcall void native_flush_tlb(void)
> {
> __native_flush_tlb();
> }
> @@ -217,12 +217,12 @@ static void native_flush_tlb(void)
> * Global pages have to be flushed a bit differently. Not a real
> * performance problem because this does not happen often.
> */
> -static void native_flush_tlb_global(void)
> +static fastcall void native_flush_tlb_global(void)
> {
> __native_flush_tlb_global();
> }
>
> -static void native_flush_tlb_single(unsigned long addr)
> +static fastcall void native_flush_tlb_single(unsigned long addr)
> {
> __native_flush_tlb_single(addr);
> }
> Index: linux-2.6.23-rt1/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.23-rt1.orig/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c 2007-10-11 15:58:08.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rt1/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c 2007-10-11 16:00:03.000000000 -0400
> @@ -344,8 +344,9 @@ out:
> put_cpu_no_resched();
> }
>
> -void native_flush_tlb_others(const cpumask_t *cpumaskp, struct mm_struct *mm,
> - unsigned long va)
> +void fastcall
> +native_flush_tlb_others(const cpumask_t *cpumaskp, struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long va)
> {
> cpumask_t cpumask = *cpumaskp;
>
> @@ -470,6 +471,7 @@ void flush_tlb_all(void)
> */
> static void native_smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)
> {
> + trace_special(cpu, 0, 0);
> WARN_ON(cpu_is_offline(cpu));
> send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of_cpu(cpu), RESCHEDULE_VECTOR);
> }
> @@ -639,6 +641,7 @@ static void native_smp_send_stop(void)
> */
> fastcall void smp_reschedule_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + trace_special(regs->eip, 0, 0);
> ack_APIC_irq();
> }
>
What's trace_special()? Has this escaped from another patch?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
