On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> After rethinking, it looks like this last cancel should be useless.
> So, if phy_interrupt() schedules only if !PHY_HALTED and phy_change()
> does enable_irq() with no exeptions, it seems phy_interrupt() even
> without lock must see PHY_HALTED state before this free_irq() with
> possible DEBUG_SHIRQ call, then maybe only this safety:
>
> WARN_ON(work_pending(&phydev->phy_queue));
Good point.
Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
