Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
+===================================+
| Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN |
|-----------------------------------|
| Instant-Off ..... [v] |
| Delay 4 Sec. ..... [ ] |
| |
|-----------------------------------|
| ^V:Move ENTER:Accept ESC:Abort |
+===================================+
'Instant-Off' is the appropriate setting, right?
Actually, default should be 4 sec delay. OS should have a chance to
shut down the system...
I don't see why this setting would have an impact on the outcome
of the 'halt' and 'poweroff' commands.
Well, it is not possible to tell, what BIOS writer have connected to this flag...
(It sucks to be stuck with a closed proprietary BIOS.)
I tested the other setting, and it didn't change anything.
The system remains powered on after executing poweroff.
Len: the system is 100% Intel (Intel CPU, Intel north bridge, Intel
south bridge, Intel integrated network controllers). Have Intel
engineers run into the same problem on a similar platform?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9148
Regards.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
