Re: [PATCH] ipv4: kernel panic when only one unsecured port available

From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:49:19 -0700

> This code has recently been reworked, but from my reading, that
> divide-by-zero can still occur.  And given that the numbers in
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range are inclusive, the arithmetic in
> inet_csk_get_port() seems to just be wrong?
> 
> So we have this, against David's current devel tree:

I'm pretty sure we took care of this, but maybe not :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] ipv4: kernel panic when only one unsecured port available
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] ipv4: kernel panic when only one unsecured port available
    • From: Anton Arapov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] ipv4: kernel panic when only one unsecured port available
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23-mm1: BUG in reiserfs_delete_xattrs
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] scsi: fix crash in gdth_timeout()
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: kernel panic when only one unsecured port available
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: kernel panic when only one unsecured port available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]