Re: [PATCH] v4l: copy_to_user() is not a good method name

On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:25:24AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Breaks on any target that has copy_to_user() defined as a non-trivial
> macro.

Where did that CALL crap come from?  We normally don;t accept junk like
that.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] v4l: copy_to_user() is not a good method name
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.23-git3 compilation broken, asm headers missing?
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Allow kconfig to accept overrides
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] v4l: copy_to_user() is not a good method name
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] v4l: copy_to_user() is not a good method name
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]