Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> s/implemented/merged/ :)
>
> IN fact shared pagetables are already there for hugepages.
> For small pages it's a patch at this point.
>   

Is it kept up to date?  Where does it live?

> no I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that I'm worried about the
> locking robustness of your trick in general.
>   

Hm, well I won't need to re-pin shared ptes anyway, so I think it's moot.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm: set_page_dirty_balance() vs ->page_mkwrite()
• Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] libsas: Provide a transport-level facility to request SAS addrs
• Previous by thread: Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK?
• Next by thread: OHCI root_port_reset() deadly loop...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]