On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 15:20 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 20:32 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Well, the thing is, we throttle pageout in throttle_vm_writeout(). As it
> > stand we can deadlock there because it just waits for the numbers to
> > drop, and unstable pages don't automagically dissapear. Only
> > write_inodes() - normally called from balance_dirty_pages() will call
> > COMMIT.
> >
> > So my thought was that calling pageout() on an unstable page would do
> > the COMMIT - we're low on memory, otherwise we would not be paging, so
> > getting rid of unstable pages seems to make sense to me.
>
> Why not rather track which mappings have large numbers of outstanding
> unstable writes at the VM level, and then add some form of callback to
> allow it to notify the filesystem when it needs to flush them out?
>
> Cheers
> Trond
BTW: Please note that at least in the case of NFS, you will have to
allow for the fact that the filesystem may not be _able_ to cause the
numbers to drop. If the server is unavailable, then we're may be stuck
in unstable page limbo for quite some time.
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
